Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nils Langer vs Federico Gaio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Langer vs Gaio analysis and find out who is favored!
Nils Langer vs Federico Gaio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Langer 1 - 0 Gaio
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Langer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gaio has won 46.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Langer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gaio has won 50.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Langer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaio has saved 56.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Langer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gaio winning 40% (W/L 18/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Langer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 66/ 47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 328/ 253), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Langer winning 1 times and Gaio being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Langer winning 2 and Gaio winning 1. The last match between Langer and Gaio was at the France F22, 22-10-2012, First, I.hard with Nils Langer getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Langer and Gaio have played a deciding set 1 times, with Langer winning 1 times and Gaio 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Langer winning 0, and Gaio 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Langer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gaio has played against players with an average rank of 314.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Langer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaio has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Langer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaio has converted 36.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
188
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
387
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
55% (275-223)
Career Total W/L
54% (520-436)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (8-14)
$49,310
Career Prize Money
$392,005
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nils Langer vs Federico Gaio For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Langer VS Gaio
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nils Langer | Federico Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nils Langer | Federico Gaio |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (8/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 37% (19/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (220/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 22% (2/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 82 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:47:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 294.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (907/1567) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (603/907) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (310/660) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (53/145) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (590/1587) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (3/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (7/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 19% (16/3) |
Nils Langer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Philipp Davydenko
Player
Nils Langer
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 2-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Franko Skugor
Player
Nils Langer
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Nils Langer
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianni Mina
Player
Nils Langer
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nils Langer
Player
Alexander Lazov
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Nils Langer
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Nils Langer
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nils Langer
Player
Tobias Simon
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
3
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nils Langer
Player
Giovanni Fonio
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
2
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
12
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nils Langer
Player
Vasile Antonescu
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Federico Gaio
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Federico Gaio
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Andrea Picchione
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Simone Agostini
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Paul Barbier Gazeu
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Federico Gaio
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Langer Vs Gaio Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Langer are available here and Gaio photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
